Johns Hopkins UniversityEst. 1876

America’s First Research University

Website Navigation for Screen Readers

Click to Return to Homepage
Menu

JHU-AEI Fellowship Exchange Program

The first cycle of the JHU-AEI Fellowship Exchange Program is now closed, and grants for the first cycle are posted below. We are delighted to announce that the program is now open for a second cycle – applications for this cycle are due on October 6, 2025.

Since Spring 2024, faculty members at Johns Hopkins University and scholars at the American Enterprise Institute (AEI) have been working together to develop pathways for greater collaboration across the two organizations.

Johns Hopkins University and the American Enterprise Institute are pleased to announce one of those pathways – a unique grant program through which JHU faculty and AEI scholars will have the opportunity to work together on research, teaching, or other projects and to participate in the intellectual life of each other’s institutions. This program seeks to broaden the points of view and deepen the insights of interested scholars in both institutions; model the virtues of reasoned exchange across difference for students and scholars; build stronger bridges between the academy and think tank sector; and signal to internal and external audiences the importance of bringing a broad range of perspectives into research that carries implications for the nation’s common life.

Grants for the First Cycle of the Program

Bridging Perspectives on the COVID-19 Response
Tony Mills (AEI) and Judd Walson (JHU/BSPH)

This project will convene a diverse group of scholars, policy experts, former and current U.S. government officials, international voices, and representatives from the private and non-profit sectors in a roundtable discussion to reflect on the divergent perspectives that have emerged regarding the success of the global and domestic COVID-19 response.

The conversation will not be a retrospective critique but a forward-facing exploration of how pluralism in expertise, values, and institutional roles can be constructively engaged in future crises.

Drawing on the roundtable conversation, the project leaders will issue a summary report, a communication toolkit, jointly authored commentary, and a proposal for sustained engagement. They will also jointly host a symposium to share results of the discussion with interested faculty and students at JHU.

Congress is Struggling. Can Changing how its Members are Elected Help?
Kevin Kosar (AEI) and Scott Warren (JHU/KSAS)

By most objective measures, the US Congress is struggling to achieve its constitutional mandate. There has been much work done to assess how Congress can be improved by augmenting its capacity and upgrading its internal organization, processes, workforce, and technology.

There has been less study of whether changing the process of electing legislators can enhance the body’s performance. We will study how electoral incentives affect legislative behavior, and whether altering how elections are conducted (e.g., replacing party primaries) could improve legislative functioning.

The project team will issue a report on their findings, host a public event at JHU and at AEI, and integrate their research effort with JHU’s DC program in Spring 2026.

Economic Power in an Age of Global Turbulence
Hal Brands (JHU/SAIS) & Michael Strain (AEI)

Issues of economic and military security have become ever more closely interwoven. Unfortunately, these subjects are often studied in isolation from one another. Moreover, policymakers and academics often take very different approaches, and so there are not many opportunities for students to consider these subjects in ways that are informed by rigorous academic study but geared toward an understanding of pressing policy issues.

The project team will host a series of five discussions on the intersection of geopolitics and economics for a group composed of JHU students and AEI research assistants, and will invite other JHU faculty and AEI scholars to join these discussions as their expertise becomes relevant to unfolding policy issues.

The goal of the project is to create a forum for discussing potentially momentous policy changes, and their long-term impacts, in real time.

Five Questions on Shaping a Multipolar Order
Yuen Yuen Ang (JHU/KSAS) and Zack Cooper (AEI)

We are living through a profound transition from the post–Cold War era of U.S. primacy to an increasingly multipolar order — still centered on the U.S. and China, but with middle powers and even small states asserting greater voice and agency in global affairs. Yet U.S. foreign policy and the architecture of international governance remain tied to older paradigms premised on U.S. dominance and stable alliances in the liberal West.

This project asks a pressing question of scholarly and policy significance: What will it take to build a peaceful multipolar order?

The project leaders will host a two-day symposium at the Hopkins Bloomberg Center in DC with experts from academia, government, business, and media.

The Health Promoting Value of Work for Medicaid Enrollees with Mental Health and Substance Use Disorders
Matthew Eisenberg (JHU/BSPH), Catherine Ettman (JHU/BSPH), Brendan Saloner (JHU/BSPH) and Sally Satel (AEI)

While many scholars agree that employment can be stabilizing and health promoting, there is disagreement about whether policies should require people with mental illness or addiction to work to receive treatment (for example, Medicaid work requirements).

This project will:

  • Map each state’s supported employment rules and reimbursement policies.
  • Analyze national Medicaid claims to see who uses these services and for how long.
  • Convene state and federal officials to set research goals.

The team will produce an academic paper and organize a policy briefing for federal and state officials on the results.

Liberal Education: A Contested Question
Robbie Shilliam (JHU/KSAS) and Ben Storey (AEI)

What is liberal education, and what should it be? If such an education liberates, what does it liberate from? What virtues does liberal education cultivate? How does liberal education relate to contemporary political debates, and how might it serve the public good?

This upper-level undergraduate course, co-taught by a professor of postcolonial politics at Johns Hopkins University and a conservative scholar at the American Enterprise Institute, brings together divergent perspectives through landmark texts on liberal education.

The conversation will address enduring questions about the character of liberal education as well as current controversies about what colleges and universities ought to teach.

A Managed Care Backlash Redux: Controlling Health Costs Amidst Growing Consumer Frustration
Benedic Ippolito (AEI) and Joseph Levy (JHU/BSPH)

This project will study the effects of modern utilization management tools such as prior authorization on patient access to drugs and inform broader policy debates about the balance between healthcare costs and access.

We will quantify real world impacts in pharmaceutical markets by leveraging a comprehensive large scale dataset of formulary management and claims information. This dataset enables us to measure how often utilization restrictions are imposed and to observe subsequent prescribing outcomes.

We will assess the extent to which these practices delay access to prescribed medications and drive patients to switch therapies or forgo treatment altogether.

Deliverables include:

  • An academic paper
  • A policy briefing
  • A Capitol Hill briefing for congressional staff and healthcare stakeholders
  • A public event in Washington, DC
  • A guest lecture in a Johns Hopkins University class
Optimizing the Design and Conduct of Clinical Trials
Ann Ervin (JHU/BSPH) and Kirsten Axelsen (AEI)

Investment in clinical trials is vital for assessing the safety and efficacy of drugs, and streamlining the cost of development is necessary to ensure patients have access to lifesaving treatments.

Innovative trial designs can improve efficiency and lower costs, and broad stakeholder engagement is essential for adoption.

This collaboration will develop the first in a series of courses for key stakeholders and BSPH students on the economics of drug development and practical opportunities to advance innovation.

To inform the course, the team will organize a roundtable with JHU faculty and students, AEI scholars, and industry professionals. A reflection essay describing and assessing the fellowship experience will be shared with JHU and AEI colleagues.

  • Course 1 on economics of drug development and innovation
  • Roundtable to inform course design
  • Reflection essay shared with JHU and AEI
Politics and Economics of the FIFA World Cup
Filipe Campante (JHU/SAIS, CBS) and Stan Veuger (AEI)

This collaboration will involve teaching a joint course on the politics and economics of the 2026 FIFA World Cup. Enrollment will be open to JHU students (50%) and members of AEI’s Collegiate Network (50%).

The course will use the World Cup to engage an ideologically diverse group of students in conversation around key economic, political, and sociological issues.

Outcomes include deeper understanding of political economy and public policy, exposure to AEI’s and JHU’s research and culture, and expanded student networks.

Practical Cost Benefit Analysis Seminar
Richard Bruns (JHU/BSPH) and Philip Wallach (AEI)

An AEI scholar and a JHU scientist will jointly lead a seminar on using cost benefit analysis as a communications tool to inform stakeholders about public policies.

All participants will complete an original analysis of a policy in their area of expertise that has not previously been the subject of a cost benefit analysis. The seminar will also place this work in context by considering the appropriate role for cost benefit analyses in the policy process.

  • Location: AEI
  • Audience: Open to JHU and AEI affiliates, including alumni, with priority for AEI analysts and JHU graduate students and early career researchers doing policy oriented work
  • Outcome: Original cost benefit analysis by each participant
Scientific Rigor Meets Funding Reform: Rethinking Research Proposal Assessment
Gundula Bosch (JHU/BSPH) & Tony Mills (AEI)

The goal of this project is to appraise existing and alternative methods for evaluating research proposals in the United States and internationally, with a focus on how these approaches affect scientific rigor, reproducibility, and responsible decision making.

The team will examine multiple evaluation frameworks, including:

  • Systematic review of criteria used across agencies and foundations
  • Utility forecasting approaches, including impact predictions for high risk research
  • Alternative scoring systems designed to reduce bias
  • Opportunity cost analysis methods for optimizing resource allocation
  • Science lotteries and other innovative mechanisms

Deliverables include a comprehensive report, a technical report and policy digest, and a public facing essay. The project leaders will also host at least one convening workshop at AEI with representatives from JHU, AEI, and other project affiliated organizations.

 

Details

This program is designed to facilitate collaboration between Johns Hopkins faculty members and AEI scholars who are interested in working together on a joint teaching or research project, or other scholarly or extracurricular endeavor, and in participating together in the intellectual life of both organizations.

To apply to take part in this program, please submit an application written jointly by one or more faculty members from JHU and one or more scholars from AEI.  

A committee composed of JHU faculty and AEI scholars will review applications.

A broad range of proposals are welcome. Successful applications will demonstrate:

  • Collaboration among the applicants throughout the term of the proposal. This could include co-teaching, a research collaboration, co-led workshops, or co-sponsored events.
  • Integration of the applicants in the intellectual life of the other’s institution. This could include incorporating one’s counterpart in class presentations, laboratory work, policy briefings, workshops, discussion groups, or professional and social events.
  • Outreach to members of the JHU and AEI communities. This could take the form of public events, the publication of reports or articles on communication platforms of both institutions, or other meaningful engagement with JHU students, faculty or staff, and AEI Collegiate Network students, research assistants or staff.
  • Bridging of different perspectives. This could include collaborators themselves bringing a difference of views to their project, or the project facilitating conversations among participants who bring different perspectives to the discussion.
  • Impact in achieving its stated objectives. Proposals should identify the educational, research, policy or other goals of the project, and explain how the proposed collaboration is structured to achieve those goals.

Teams

A unique aspect of this grant is the formation of cross-institutional teams between interested JHU faculty and AEI scholars.

Faculty and scholars are invited to reach out to the contacts below if they are interested in help identifying potential collaborators at the other institution.

Applications

The deadline for applications is October 6, 2025.

Applications are welcome from all full-time faculty members at Johns Hopkins University, working in any academic or professional discipline, and from all residential and non-residential scholars at the American Enterprise Institute.

The term of the program is one year, although projects that extend beyond one year will be considered.

Funding for projects is capped at $50,000. Applicants may be able to seek additional funds at the completion of a successful project.

We recommend that a JHU departmental administrator review the proposed budget for accuracy or other issues, and that applicants reach out to Phil Spector at [email protected] to discuss the proposed budget prior to submission.

Funds can be used for salary, stipends, graduate students, postdoctoral fellows, equipment, travel, convenings and other engagements. Fringe should be included in all salary requests from JHU faculty.  Fringe should not be included in stipend requests from AEI scholars.

Applications should include:

  • The proposal’s title.
  • A project narrative that includes a description of the project and its goals, a project plan and timeline, and a brief discussion of how the proposal will meet each of the five considerations detailed above (collaboration, integration, outreach, bridging, and impact). This section of the proposal section should be no more than three pages, not including references. Please use 12-point font and margins no smaller than 1⁄2 inch.
  • A budget breakdown that identifies the proposed funding and explains how it will be apportioned for personnel, supplies, equipment, travel, or other project expenses.
  • A short bio-sketch of key participants that emphasizes relevant expertise.

Contacts

Questions about the program should be directed to Phil Spector at [email protected] and Jenna Storey at [email protected].

Apply Here

 

Website Footer Navigation